On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 21:23 -0500, Jacques B. wrote: > Use WPA, Reasonably good. We'll see how long that lasts, someone will probably come up with an easy hack at some stage. > MAC filtering (only allow connections from ...), Virtually useless except for preventing *accidental* connections. > don't broadcast SSID Utterly useless. You still transmit, you appear as *something* on the list of available connections, just not named. Hackers can still get in, quite easily. > (and don't use a SSID that provides someone with an indication of who > owns the AP - more for privacy reasons), Bad advice, as it stands. Yes, probably don't call it "Tim's AP" if you don't want neighbours to know which is really which, but do pick some unique name that identifies them apart (e.g. something like "ap2370" is generic and unique). Though, on the other hand, if you have problems with channel interference, as some do, then it can be handy to work out an arrangement with your neighbours about using different channels. That's easier to do if you know who's running what. Accidental connections are less likely if you broadcast an SSID that obviously isn't the access point that they' want. e.g. If all the neighbours SSID were "netgearap" they couldn't easily tell which ones they should be using. I've seen places where there's three virtually identical access points on the list, and where it wasn't appropriate to just use anything. Google around for the myths of wireless security. -- (This computer runs FC7, my others run FC4, FC5 & FC6, in case that's important to the thread.) Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
