Les Mikesell wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:
1. The subject. I thought you were talking about connecting to a
Windows desktop.
2. I use KDE
3. You didn't persuade me it's better than VNC.
What he describes is VNC - just the gnome variation (vino) and it
doesn't get copy/paste right with a windows client. The KDE flavor
is krfb.
I've read it again, understanding improves with a second reading:-)
It might use vnc as the mechanism, but it's not what most users would
think of as "remote desktop."
More like desktop sharing.
I'm not sure I understand your distinction. This is a way to connect to
the running session on the console. There are other ways, and
different approaches if you want separate and/or multiple sessions
independent from the console.
the terminology most people will be familiar with comes from Windows,
because that's what most people use.
Windows XP Professional comes with "remote desktop" which allows one to
login remotely. Remote Desktop is, I think, the client for Windows
Terminal Server. Windows 2003 Server without WTS allows two users to be
connected at once.
Apple has something similar, "Apple Remote Desktop."
Windows XP, Home and Professional, allow users to share their desktop.
What one sees remotely is what one sees at the screen. It's different.
On F8 (and earlier releases), KDE has Settings/Desktop Sharing. It
allows remote users to see the local desktop, but it's not equivalent to
"remote desktop" as used by either Apple or Microsoft.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
