Re: Fedora/Linux as a USB Drive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



max wrote on Sunday 13 January 2008:

> I don't see why it should be difficult but I have to admit I have not
> tried such a thing. What's the difference between mounting an IPOD via
> usb and another computer?

There are several differences. I admit I never used an iPod, but let's 
assume it acts like an ordinary flash MP3 player.

The first first difference: iPod is an USB slave device, the PC's USB 
controller is a master. Master works well with a slave, two masters don't 
work together. That is simply a matter of USB design. So whenever two 
masters have to be connected, you need extra hardware between them.

As Les just pointed out (his answer came in faster than I could 
reply... ;-)) iPod "knows" how to act as mass storage device. I guess it 
exposes its internal storage over USB. As soon as it is disconnected the 
iPod can access its storage itself.

> The 
> computers have the advantage of knowing each others language, so to
> speak,

No they don't. :) They know how to talk to mass storage devices, but they 
do know how to behave as a mass storage device.

> I could see the benefit in communicating this way between 
> machines and sharing a single network interface or simply plugging to
> machines together to distribute a compiling job.

Of course it would be beneficial. But you run into *many* problems. You 
would have to emulate a mass storage device with sectors (how big should 
it be?) and all those thing. On this faked device there would have to be 
a file system (which one?... FAT? ext2? ext3? NTFS? HFS+?) and all write 
operations would have to be kept synchronized to avoid file system 
corruption, which is almost impossible. Why impossible? Because mounting 
system would see a mass storage device and use all sorts of caching and 
optimized writing strategies. Mass storage devices simple were not 
designed for beeing used by multiple hosts.

Of course all those problems could be solved. One could use a distributed 
file system and write all needed drivers. It would cost time and the 
benefits would not be worth all the trouble.

-- 
bye,
Adalbert

Androphobia: Fear of men.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux