Re: java again really

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Craig White wrote:

Like I said before, I haven't installed a fedora since FC6 - but until recently I thought I was just waiting for the outside resources I need to catch up. CentOS is fine, but unlike the commercial RHEL version that actually solves the fedora-specific problem that spawned this whole thread, CentOS does not supply a copy of Sun java.
----
Not a fedora issue, but it was quite simple to install Sun's java on
CentOS-5

It's not impossible. But the whole repository of jpackage'd java programs was available under centos-4, and isn't for centos-5.

----
I give up
Does that mean you actually like a distribution that doesn't work out of the box and is actively working to reduce it's cooperation with the outside resources that supply the things it needs to work? I don't see much choice but to change to Ubuntu or one of the others as soon as I become paranoid about the end of security updates on my FC6 boxes. There's just a lot of baggage related to installation and administration tools that goes with a distribution switch and I hate to give up what I've learned from experience back to RH4.x versions.
----
since updates are indeed toast on FC6, I have to presume that what you
are referring to is probably K12LTSP (derived from FC6) and given the
current state of LTSP development, you are probably migrating to Ubuntu
anyway so I am sort of wondering if you aren't just putting out straw
man arguments here.

I don't really rely on ltsp, but now that you mention it, I have always installed k12ltsp instead of stock fedora for its other usability features. It is always a respin that includes the current updates at the time of its release, and it includes push-button scripted installs for an assortment of needed programs that the distribution omits (flash, MS fonts, java, webmin, etc.).

If you aren't running F7 or F8, any point you might
have regarding usage of java (Sun or otherwise) on F7 or F8 is
irrelevant.

But that is the point of why I'm not running them.

Peter's assertion is surely clear enough, that Fedora does have
community participation and you can join the development group to help
guide the packaging, at least to become involved in the process but
clearly you want this ability without the commitment. Some people choose
to curse the darkness and some choose to light candles.

I'm not interested in helping a distribution become self-contained and a limited subset of what it could be if it simply cooperated with independent 3rd parties.

--
  Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux