Ric Moore wrote:
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 12:28 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
Because you'd be pissed off at spending $50 for a mere 10 mls of liquid
inside a quite large plastic box that's mostly empty. Wondering, why in
hell's name, can't they use a larger cartridge and really fill it with
lots of ink.
Of course *we* know why - maximising profits. They could, quite easily,
make bigger cartridges that hold more ink, and not charge as much.
So refill them. It isn't very hard and for HP cartridges its cut my ink
costs dramatically.
Alan, I worked in the Chemical Industry as a Field Representative, doing
lots of technical stuff like titrations, electrical work, A to D
conversions to control peristaltic computerized pumps, lotsa techie
hands-on stuff for 26 years and taught others as well.
I tried filling a cartridge once. Paid good money for a kit with all
kinds little widgets included to fill the cartridge with ink. What a
friggin' mess! Maybe the instructions needed to be dumbed down a bit,
but I got more ink on me than I got into the cartridge. <chuckles>
I don't have my own printer (pretty much for the reasons being
discussed), but my dad uses inkjet refills and found the most
reliable method was a syringe and a hypodermic needle.
--
imalone
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
