On Thu, 27 Dec 2007, Martin Marques wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day escribió:
> >
> > and if one were to start a new project that didn't have to be strictly
> > backward compatible with anything, and one already had a decent
> > grounding in CVS, subversion would also be a reasonable choice.
>
> Why?
because subversion corrects a number of CVS "issues", and the command
structure is very similar to that of CVS, so all that CVS knowledge
can be transferred over fairly quickly.
i didn't say that subversion was the best version control system of
all the possible choices -- only that, if one was already fairly
conversant with CVS, it would be a "reasonable" choice for a new
project.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
