Re: Is this a tcpwrapper bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17/12/2007, Tom Horsley <tom.horsley@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:05:04 +0900
> John Summerfield <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I don't see that tcpwrappers does a lot for you in this case than you
> > can also do with iptables.
>
> Sure it does: It achieves exactly what I want, and doesn't require
> yet another daemon to be running with yet another obscure
> command language to learn :-). (The hosts.allow syntax is only
> about 1/10th as obscure as the iptables commands).

There's nothing wrong with the hosts.allow approach, but do note that
using the iptables approach doesn't require yet another daemon to be
running.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux