On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 04:28 +0000, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Craig White wrote: > > >> > I do have cupsd running as shown previously. > >> > >> I haven't read the whole thread, > >> but I haven't seen any evidence that cupsd is running on your machine. > >> > >> What is the output of "ps aux | grep cups" ? > >> > >> Also what is the result of "telnet localhost 631"? > >> And "telnet 127.0.0.1 631"? > >> > >> > My present problem is getting it to accetp the root password > >> > >> I'm not sure what you mean. > >> If cupsd is running then you should be able to browse to localhost:631 > >> without giving the superuser password. > >> > >> I strongly suspect your problem is much simpler than you think. > > > Timothy...you're not helping > > > > his packages are screwed up from a completely out of control yum.repos.d > > folder > > > > He needs to fix that, and then update his packages to obtain sanity. > > What you say may well be true. > But I doubt if it has anything to do with his cups problem. > If cupsd is running then the problem with cups > is likely to be something very simple - > eg perhaps the line "Listen localhost:631" in /etc/cups/cupsd.conf > has somehow got deleted. > > As far as the problem with yum.repos.d is concerned, > I would have recommended running "grep enabled=1 /etc/yum.repos.d/*.repo" > and seen what repos were enabled (probably very few), > and disabling all except fedora and fedora-updates. > > As far as cups is concerned, I would run "service cups restart" > and then look in /var/log/cups/error_log > to see what was reported there. ---- you seem to simply ignore that you prefaced this all with "I haven't read the whole thread" and yet, you still want to persist with it. Help if you wish - but he's had no less than 8 people tell him the same things (about cups)...that's why I objected to your interference. You may be right about his cupsd.conf - I am fairly certain that he is missing some cups dependencies but we can't figure that out because of the complete mess in /etc/yum.repos.d Now, just to show you how absurd your concept is of grep enabled=1 is... This was the contents of his /etc/yum.repos.d... atrpms.repo atrpms-bleeding.repo atrpms-stable.repo atrpms-testing.repo jpackage-fedora.repo jpackage-generic.repo jpackage.repo kde-redhat.repo kde-redhat-stable-all.repo kde-redhat-stable.repo livna-devel.repo livna-devel.repo.rpmorig livna.repo livna.repo.rpmorig livna.repo.rpmsave livna-testing.repo dag.repo dries.repo freshrpms.repo freshrpms.repo.rpmnew rpmforge.repo mirrors-rpmforge fedora-core.repo.rpmnew fedora-development.repo fedora-devel.repo fedora-core.repo.rpmsave fedora-updates.repo.rpmnew fedora.repo fedora-updates.repo fedora.repo.rpmnew fedora-extra-devel.repo fedora-extra.repo fedora.us-extras fedora-extras-devel.repo Fedora-install-media.repo fedora-updates-testing.repo.rpmnew fedora-updates-testing.repo local-base local-devel local-extra-devel local-extras local-updates-testing local-updates home.repo gstreamer.repo gstreamer-deps.repo yjl.repo nr.repo newrpms.repo nrpms.repo Macromedia city-fan.org.repo Now if you consider that fedora-updates.repo and fedora-updates.repo.rpmnew et al, how are you gonna know which one is from Fedora 2, 3, 4, 5, 8 or whatever? As I said, you admitted you didn't follow the thread, gave minimal thought to the issue of his /etc/yum.repos.d condition but feel competent to give opinions. Nice...thanks - I'm going to bed and you can help him out. Craig -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
