Tony Nelson wrote:
> The reason seems weak to me, but test does not require a closing
> square bracket, while [ does, and:
> ...
>> GNU Coding Standards now declare that the behaviour of binary
>> should not depend on its name.
From http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/User-Interfaces.html:
Please don't make the behavior of a utility depend on the name used to
invoke it. It is useful sometimes to make a link to a utility with a
different name, and that should not change what it does.
Sounds more like a request than a declaration ;-)
I wish they had provided some rationale, seeing as how the practice has
a long history on Unix, and I (at least) have not run into any situation
where it caused a problem.
Requiring the closing bracket or not seems like a trivial difference in
behavior, no?
Yep, I'll go with 'weak' as well.
Over a few hundred systems, this must be wasting almost a penny's worth
of space.
<Joe
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
