At 5:23 PM -0800 12/10/07, Rick Stevens wrote: >On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 16:17 +0000, Jonathan Allen wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 04:50:13PM +0100, Antonio M asked: >> > > >> > > # service network start >> > > Bringing up loopack interface: [ OK ] >> > > Bringing up interface eth0: [FAILED] >> > > Error, some other host already uses address 192.168.1.6 >> > >> > did you try to start the machine disconnected from your network??? >> >> No, the network was and is still attached to the network. > >Have you rebooted/power cycled the box? Looking at the network scripts, >that message comes from an arping poke and that's pretty definitive. > >Try changing the IP address in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 >to something fairly high (say 192.168.1.200) and see if it'll come up >via "service network restart". If it does, then try pinging 192.168.1.6 >and see if something really does have that address. It may be that the >address was handed out by a DHCP server on your network. > >If that is indeed the case, find the DHCP server and see what its >address pool is. You should choose a fixed IP that's outside that pool >or this will happen again. > >You could resort to having eth0 use DHCP by deleting the "IPADDRESS=" >and "NETMASK=" lines in the file above and changing the "BOOTPROTO=" >line to "BOOTPROTO=dhcp". The normal network stuff handles DHCP just >fine. Example /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 for DHCP: > > DEVICE=eth0 > BOOTPROTO=dhcp > ONBOOT=yes > TYPE=Ethernet > USERCTL=no > PEERDNS=yes > IPV6INIT=no Or maybe it just thinks that some interface already has the address, and a `dhclient -r` would fix it, and a `ip -addr` or `ifconfig -a` might show it. -- ____________________________________________________________________ TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/> -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
