On 01/12/2007, Fred Erickson <frederickson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The print server I'm using (Hawking HPS1U) with my network, which > consists of a couple of Fedora machines and a couple of M$ machines, has > no Linux support that I can find on their web site, however, the on-disk > manual has a unix install section. I initially configured it using the > included software on an XP computer, then set the printer up on the > Fedora computers with drivers provided with Cups. That would be a problem for me. I've no XP machine to do that with. I suppose that it could be done with an XP virtual machine, but if that is the case then I'm not going for it. I'll not support a company that forces me into using an expensive, unsafe, unstable proprietary operating system of their choice. > The HPS1U is completely configurable via a web browser once it has an IP > address. The manual says IP is enabled by default. I won't have time for > several days to re-set it to defaults and give it a try. > > I'm thinking that the print driver and not the print server hardware is > the determining factor as to whether or not a multifunction printer will > work with a networked printer. Sounds logical. I don't know the nitty gritty of how it works, so I thought that maybe there was no actually communication between the Fedora box and the printer itself, rather just documents going Fedora -> Print Server -> Printer and no facility for Printer -> Fedora communication (as a scanner would need). Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
