On Friday 30 November 2007 04:53, Kam Leo wrote: > On Nov 29, 2007 8:25 PM, Peter Reed <mrdeadworry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thursday 29 November 2007 01:37:33 Tony Molloy wrote: > > > HI, > > > > > > nspluginwrapper causes SELinux denials when it's in enforcing mode. > > > This means that when you do a full install of F8 you cannot get a > > > browser running. I know there is a workaround with chcon and semanage. > > > But what I'd like to know is if I'm running a 32bit system then is > > > nspluginwrapper really necessary at all or is it only for 64bit > > > systems. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Tony > > > > You only need nspluginwrapper for 64bit systems it is meaningless for a > > 32bit system. Why would you install this on a 32bit system if you read > > the description of what it is and what it does you would understand it is > > for 32bit compatibility on 64bit systems. > > Peter > That's what I thought. But why then is it in the i386 Fedora spin. Surely it should be in Everything. If you do a full install of the Fedora spin or you do a DVD install it is installed by default. Tony > I've been informed that it (nspluginwrapper) is installed by default. > It was not installed (or it was not in the path) on one system but was > installed on another. Both were F8-i386 DVD installs. See above. Tony -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
