Il Thursday 29 November 2007 13:09:29 Michael Schwendt ha scritto: > On 29/11/2007, Nico Sabbi wrote: > > Hi, > > a proof of $Subject: > > > > [nico@nico2 ~]$ rpm -qa | grep -i firefox > > firefox-2.0.0.9-1.fc8 > > firefox-2.0.0.9-1.fc8 > > > > [root@nico2 ~]# du -sh /usr/lib/firefox-2.0.0.* > > 6,8M /usr/lib/firefox-2.0.0.6 > > 20K /usr/lib/firefox-2.0.0.8 > > 43M /usr/lib/firefox-2.0.0.9 > > > > Obviously > > rpm -qif on /usr/lib/firefox-2.0.0.6 and on > > /usr/lib/firefox-2.0.0.8 reported that the directories weren't > > owned by any package. > > You draw wrong conclusions. The directories _are_ owned by the > firefox package with the corresponding version. It's just that when > the old package was removed, the directory was not empty and > contained _files_ that don't belong into the firefox package, and > RPM _can't_ remove the directory then. So, what files do you still > find in the two old directories? > now there's nothing, because I removed them. anyway, when I install extensions I always do it as ordinary users from within firefox itself (that is, without using rpm or yum), so I can't have installed files in there (unless some other .rpm does it; maybe some .rpm extension? ) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
