Hi Jeff, On Nov 23, 2007 8:34 PM, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Nov 23, 2007 12:31 PM, André Costa <blueser@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yeah, agreed about the resources. That's exactly why I am proposing > > that Fedora developers release early versions of anaconda's deps > > solver only -- not the whole thing. > > Isn't anaconda making use of yum's depsolver directly? My reading of > the bugzilla comments tells me this is reproducible with yum directly > without needing to use anaconda. > > So if depsolving problems are really yum bugs, don't we already have > enough tools being released as part of the testing process for people > interested in stress testing the depsolver without any extra releases > of anything? > > Comment 14 in the bug report has an example on how to yum reproduce > this specific issue. Cool, this could be a start indeed =) Still, IMHO if it is intended to be widely used it should demand less user effort to be configured and tried out, and could be a little more user friendly (e.g. don't output yum's messages directly, instead show some higher level output). And, of course, don't violate the "don't touch anything" assertive ;-) Regards, Andre -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
