Frank Cox wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:08:02 -0600
Tom Poe <tompoe@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Seems OK to me. What do you think?
What do you get when you type about:plugins ?
Java is all "yes" and shows libjavaplugin_oji.so and looks good to me.
Tom
File name: libjavaplugin_oji.so
Java(TM) Plug-in 1.6.0_03
MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled
application/x-java-vm Java
Yes
application/x-java-applet Java
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.1 Java
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.1.1 Java
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.1.2 Java
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.1.3 Java
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.2 Java
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.2.1 Java
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.2.2 Java
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.3 Java
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.3.1 Java
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.4 Java
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.4.1 Java
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.4.2 Java
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.5 Java
Yes
application/x-java-applet;version=1.6 Java
Yes
application/x-java-applet;jpi-version=1.6.0_03 Java
Yes
application/x-java-bean Java
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.1 Java
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.1.1 Java
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.1.2 Java
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.1.3 Java
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.2 Java
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.2.1 Java
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.2.2 Java
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.3 Java
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.3.1 Java
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.4 Java
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.4.1 Java
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.4.2 Java
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.5 Java
Yes
application/x-java-bean;version=1.6 Java
Yes
application/x-java-bean;jpi-version=1.6.0_03 Java
Yes
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
