Phil Wherry wrote: > Greetings! > > I've been using Samba successfully for years, but I've run into a > problem for which I could use some expert debugging ideas. > > I've got a Fedora 7 server sharing the root of its filesystem. I've > been using "force user = root" in the smb.conf file so that filesystem > permissions are never an issue (this is a single-user machine on an > isolated network, so security isn't really a concern). This worked > fine until recently. > > I updated recently to Samba 3.0.27 (using the standard "yum update" > mechanism on Fedora to pick up new packages). I don't know exactly > what I was running before, but I presume it was some version of > 3.0.26; I apply updates regularly. I didn't find any mention of > changed "force user" behavior in the 3.0.27 release notes. > > In any case, I can still authenticate, and I can still access the > filesystem, but not with root's permissions (nor those of the user who > authenticates). I've checked logs (at both normal and elevated > debugging levels) and can't see any obvious evidence of a problem. But > clearly smbd is now having problems assuming the identity of the root > user. > > Can anyone offer suggestions as to how I might seek to isolate the > source of this problem? > > Here's the relevant section of the smb.conf file. As I mentioned > earlier, I can authenticate without difficulty; I just don't get the > right set of permissions after doing so. SELinux is off, so that's not > the cause. > > [gwroot] > browseable = yes > writable = yes > path = / > guest ok = no > comment = Root > valid users = psw > force user = root > > Thanks for any suggestions! > > Phil Wherry With each update of Samba, there's always a slight risk of samba.conf options changing slightly. I recommending running the samba suite "testparm" command to see if anything gets flagged. Eric Feldhusen -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
