Hi Paul, On Nov 19, 2007 4:14 PM, Paul Johnson <pauljohn32@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2007 11:46 AM, Frank Cox <theatre@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:36:48 -0200 > > André Costa <blueser@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > My problem now is Mozilla plugins: > > > > Do all of your plugins show up under about:plugins ? > > > > On this x86_64 machine I had to create symbolic links from the files > > in /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/ to ~/.mozilla/plugins before they would show up. > > > > I just tried watching a trailer on apple.com and it worked. > > > > -- > > MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com > > > > > I got fed up wrestling with this and removed firefox-x86_64. The i386 > version works with the plugins, no trouble, plus I got Java support. > > What benefit flows from using the x86_64 firefox? This is pretty much what I've done, too. Damn Adobe and Sun for not providing 64bit versions of their plugins (Java also doesn't work with firefox-64), and Apple for not providing QuickTime at all. The main difference is that I kept x86_64 version around so that I don't need to remove yelp (which depends on it). This is only possible if you install firefox-32, which provides a convenient way of starting the 32bit version (you will need to modify gnome-panel's applet accordingly, and also preferred browser setting). HTH Andre -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
