Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 21:39 -0500, Jim Cornette wrote:
Craig White wrote:
Obviously not having the source, neither fedora nor xorg are going to
distribute the binary version of fglrx (ATI).
FWIW, it does work much better than the xorg 'radeon'
I used livna's install
Craig
It appears that either the ATI installer or the livna version work for
my system. Attached is the output of a failed livna binary.
I had to revert to radeon again but only edited the diver and kept the
generated configuration for the fglrx attempt.
----
Jim,
I had to take a couple of runs at it to get it working - I'm not at the
office now...I'll follow up with more info when I get to the office.
Craig
Thanks! I would of course use an outstanding radeon driver from Fedora
instead of using an outside the distro version. With the decayed
graphics quality though, outside drivers if they work better would be a
solution until the radeon driver (Multistage with the ati, if I recall)
is in a tolerable state again. I'm putting up the white flag for
submitting bugs since the last problem with the i810 was shuffled
upstream for most of the bug correspondence. I think the radeon problem
would be handled the same if a report was posted in RH bugzilla.
Jim
--
Windows hasn't increased computer literacy. It's just lowered the standard.
-- From a Slashdot.org post
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
