Hi Claude, On Nov 14, 2007 12:14 AM, Claude Jones <cjones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue November 13 2007, André Costa wrote: > > Please let me know if there's any additional info I can provide. > > > > Damn, this is really frustrating =/ > > Lots of people reporting this issue including me. I did a yum upgrade on two > machines that failed on upgrade from the DVD in the way you describe. Worked > beautifully. It took a long time - I had to remove a couple of packages on > one machine that failed dependency checks, but other than that, it worked. > The usual little stuff is broken after the upgrade, but nothing show-stopping > so far. Avahi ends up with two instances after the update, but you can google > the fix for that - it's simple. Long time means overnight - there were around > 1400 packages on each machine that got updated. Both were complete when I > looked the next morning. Thks for sharing your experience. Well, something is definitely broken on F8 upgrade process, a Core 2 Duo should never need 1+ hour of processing at 1.0 load to figure out the dependencies -- even if it's just to realize it can't go further for some reason (eg. third-party packages -- which I do have, from Freshrpms). I remember experiencing similar delays with F6 --> F7 upgrade, but it wasn't comparable to this. It looks like anaconda still needs some serious work. Well, a network upgrade with yum should work, but what will happen if I lose connection for some reason? Will it be possible to recover from a half-completed upgrade? Is it possible to use yum to upgrade from the installation DVD? I'll try to file a bug report for this (if there isn't one about it yet) hoping that F9 will come with a anaconda that works =/ Regards, Andre -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
