On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 12:52 -0800, Daniel Qarras wrote: > that is not part of core business might raise questions. With > Satellite Most businesses today accept that the IP is the real value for their core business. That is why IT has taken off. Protecting that IP in the networked world of today is a challenge, and one that a system must protect. Configuring a server farm is complex, and a task I would not lightly undertake, but a single tool makes the system more brittle, easier to attack and known configuration parameters yield knowledge of the structure and weaknesses. So while such a tool would make it convenient to setup and manage a network, that same tool them becomes another Achilles heel in the circle of protection. But I won't argue about the purchasing people. However part of the task of being a manager is helping those responsible for the money realize the value of the choices made, and the costs of each of the alternatives, both initial and long term. However be aware that long term costs are written off against inflation vs growth, with growth often expressed as 20 or 30 percent, which can really deflate the delayed investment, compared to an initial outlay. Thus a lump up front with lower support costs is often a good trade off in purchasing, while 0 up front with higher long term costs is sometimes reprehensible. Designing the purchasing argument in terms of direct costs often is a loosing battle for networks. Designing the purchasing argument in terms of insurance is a far better paradigm, and one that financial folks realize. Regards, Les H -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
