Re: Fedora lifetime and stability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



As for a long life (if you can call it that) OS, you should use Windows! ><
>> as for whom don't understand, this was a little joke
 
As an experimenting expired teenager (21) I've been using Linux for about 5 years now.
@ first, I just downloaded like all kinds of linux (an installed them ALL!!!), i have to admit, I have to admit, i had a lot of time back those days.
After 2 years I had FC5 and Suse 9.xx running. I got frustrated when Suse 10.xx introduced the supersize-me menu. (and now Vista did the same!) :(
As I saw Fedora move on, the way I liked the gui, I started to use it on both machines.
Now I invested a lot of money on books and stuff for fedora and installed even my homebrew server based on fedora. (even if it's not the most stable os)
I spend a lot of time in the dark, searching for random stuff, like how to get my asus usb-modem to work, tweak the os for my needs, install games, etc..
 
Now this is WHY I use Fedora.
I just love to be in that dark room, spending time @ flashing console screens, lovely man-pages and other -at-the-end- useless stuff.
If I hated the upgrading, the solving, the tweaking, etc... I'd use RHEL , CentOS or mac.
 
I guess it all starts at the point where you have too choose your flavour of OS.
 
My opinion is that Fedora is, for me, the best OS EVER! (for now) :) ;)
It feels like a toboggan. You have to klimb the stairs, get the ride of your life, and have to klimb them again to do it over and over and over and ...

 
2007/11/13, Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 18:22 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> But just to recompile a new version of an application like sendmail,
> or a new firefox version, or similar is practical. That is assuming
> the infrastructure is in place, as it was for Fedora Legacy.

This is about where I expected someone to say, "if Fedora used external
packages as they were, rather than customising them for Fedora, users
could simply recompile the latest source, themselves, and it'd work."

--
[tim@bigblack ~]$ uname -ipr
2.6.23.1-10.fc7 i686 i386

Using FC 4, 5, 6 & 7, plus CentOS 5.  Today, it's FC7.

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.



--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux