Re: Concerning wireless light on my laptop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 23:43 +0100, Christoph Höger wrote:
> Aaron Konstam schrieb:
> > On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 19:08 +0100, Christoph Höger wrote:
> >> Tim schrieb:
> >>> Tim:
> >>>>> But mine doesn't actually use them for activity status.  They don't
> >>>>> change when using wireless (i.e. there's no blinking during reception
> >>>>> not transmission), and they don't change for network availability (it's
> >>>>> lit if you've enabled your wireless hardware, whether or not their is
> >>>>> another wireless device to connect to).
> >>> Christoph Höger:
> >>>> what hardware (and what driver) do you use? I saw this with iwl3945.
> >>>> That is not very surprising as iwl3945 is still beta software.
> >>> [tim@suspishus ~]$ /sbin/lspci | grep ireless
> >>> 03:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection (rev 02)
> >>>
> >>> It uses whatever driver it finds automatically, as came with the
> >>> original installation.  I've not added anything, it worked out of the
> >>> box, so to speak.
> >>>
> >>> At least the networking works, even if the LED doesn't work
> >>> properly.  ;-)
> >>>
> >> Well, then you have to wait for the intel developers to integrate the 
> >> led into their driver. I doubt that this is a very high priority target ;)
> >>
> > But it is funny that they incorporated it in to the Windows driver, but
> > maybe that is because there are more Windows machines.
> 
> The difference is: iwl3945 is pretty new (mac80211 related stuff) and 
> AFAIK not even in the official kernel. So it't absolutely normal that 
> those low priority features are the last ones that get finished.
> (What would you say if you'd had that LED but 90% package loss)

If you look at the readmes with the code, you'll see that the developers
specifically don't "flash the light" as the CPU cycles needed to do that
were better spent (at least in this iteration of the code) doing real
work.  If you build the stuff from the source tarballs, there is a
config option ("./configure --with-leds" or something like that) that
will build it with led-flashing enabled.  I'd have to dig into it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Principal Engineer             rstevens@xxxxxxxxxxxx -
- CDN Systems, Internap, Inc.                http://www.internap.com -
-                                                                    -
-  What's small, yellow and very, VERY dangerous?  The root canary!  -
----------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux