Re: Wireless (iwl4965AGN) works with Live CD but not DVD install

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 16:18 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:32:32PM -0700, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 12:24 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 07:49:47AM -0700, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> > > 
> > > > The upshot of it is that if I install using the Live CD or DVD (32 or 64
> > > > bit), the Intel WiFi card works with no issues out of the box. If, OTOH,
> > > > installing from the install DVD (32 or 64 bit), the WiFi card never
> > > > works correctly.
> > > 
> > > What is the output of `rpm -q iwl4965-firwmare`?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > John
> > 
> > I haven't been able to do more installs from the install DVD, but output
> > from the x86-64 Live DVD (the one that's working) is:
> > 
> > /lib/firmware/iwlwifi-4965-1.ucode
> > /lib/firmware/iwlwifi-4965.ucode
> > /usr/share/doc/iwl4965-firmware-4.44.1.18
> > /usr/share/doc/iwl4965-firmware-4.44.1.18/LICENSE
> > /usr/share/doc/iwl4965-firmware-4.44.1.18/README
> 
> Hmmm...well, I was hoping to see the output from the situation that
> is _not_ working... :-)

...Yeah - I kinda figured that. :)

I just had to get this working because I'm headed out on a trip early
tomorrow morning and needed my laptop in shape for it.

If it helps, I did check to see that the firmware was installed
in /lib/firmware in the non-working situation. The two .ucode files were
definitely there. I remember that because I went searching to find them
and compare them to what was available on Intel's site and they matched.

I didn't check the documentation files though, and I also didn't check
the contents of the firmware RPM file. But I'm pretty sure they were the
same. Perhaps someone who installed from DVD can confirm that.

I can also tell you that, in the non-working situation, dmesg output was
saying that the drivers thought the card's hardware switch was off
(meaning that the card was physically turned off). In reality the card
was definitely turned on. That might provide some additional clues.

Cheers,

Chris

--
====================================================
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice there is.

--Yogi Berra

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux