Mark W. Jeanmougin wrote: > FYI: I'm having the 26% - 28% problem during the dependency check. > I've seen it on a x86_64 and on i386 hardware. > > And, I've seen it while upgrading from Fedora 7 or Fedora Core 6. > > This is using the DVD. > > I know I'm not offering any solutions in this email, but I wanted to > add two more data points of failure. Another data point (with something you could even call a solution). It happened to me: got to 25-26% in about one minute than sit there for more than an hour, with strace showing a probable infinite dependency loop). - F7->F8 on i386 hardware - tried both via DVD and HTTP (of copied DVD content) - tried both graphical and textual The DVD is missing a lot of stuff that is installed on my system (e.g. Thunderbird). I suppose the upgrade would have upgraded the "basic" packages and left the rest to yum; or maybe it assumes an Internet connection and tries to download the packages? Anyway, I managed to upgrade the system with the yum method: rpm -Uhv fedora-release and than yum upgrade (extra tricks with wget and --downloaddir option of yum to avoid the slow downloading speed of yum on many small packages). But I removed a few problematic packages from other repositories and reinstalled them after upgrading. At the end, the upgrade finished successfully. Initially many apps refused to start (firefox!) and I had some crazy system freezes; then I found that the problem was related to the xfs server, which was not started and which easily died after manual starting. The xorg conf was still containing the unix:/7100 line, I had to remove it manually. I also fixed a couple of probably incorrect links in fontpath.d (the ":unscaled" part was included in the link destination and so the link was not going to the correct directories). I don't know if the xorg conf problems are related to the yum method, maybe anaconda would have fixed that part itself. The system is now OK. Hibernation also works, but I'm going to replace the kernel with the tuxonice one from atrpms. Tuxonice (formerly suspend2) is faster and proved itself very reliable for me; I have been using suspend2 for a couple of years with great results. Upgrading to F8 interrupted more than 30 days of hibernating/resuming twice a day. (I'm actually forgetting how the boot process looks like :-) ) I have to add that this F7->F8 upgrade has been by far the most difficult in my Redhat/Fedora history, which started on RedHat 5.1 (5.1, 5.2, 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, 7.0, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 8.0, 9, fc1, fc2, fc3, fc4, fc5, fc6, f7, f8). It was actually the first time I had to restore the entire system from a backup (yes, I backup before upgrading). While the yum upgrade was in progress (1600 packages to be updated), the stupid weekly cron "rpm -q" script started and managed to lock yum at 600 packages done, 1000 to go, in a way I think it's not solveable (waiting on a futex). I did not even try to fix a system where 600 packages were duplicated (f7 and f8 both installed, as the rpm cleanup is only done by yum at the end). Sorry, this mail grew bigger than expected. Best regards. -- Roberto Ragusa mail at robertoragusa.it -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
