On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 01:48:05 -0600 "Arthur Pemberton" <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes, but they use not so up-to-date software as F! > It's stable. You can't be bleeding edge and stable at the same time. I mean the last versions... > > Why not satisfy > > Serguei Miridonov thought? > Well it isn't a matter of just satisfying him. If it ibe true the question will not arise so often. Seems Serguei Miridonov did not give the question all those times. > Why some speak F needs shorter > > lifetime/release period just to be on "edge"? - the thing I keep > > try to find out not the first time. > Because having it both ways takes up ALOT more resources. Would you Well. The community in any way (short/long support period term) moves the project forth - question on resources here just not suitable. Then why all the work can not be called under single release name rather than multiple? Or I miss something? Or let's specify what is release in FP sense? What is changed from release to release so that all the software updates can not be titled under the same release name? > like to start paying for Fedora? What have you donated to Fedora > lately? Nothing for now. And what is it? - Hope You have any right to ask such a question. May You will be pleased to share with us with Your achievements in the field of F-donations? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
