On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 19:11 +0100, Adalbert Prokop wrote: > Tim Alberts wrote on Tuesday 30 October 2007: > > > It's certainly not selfish if you want run production servers...it just > > prompts the question (yet again), 'is Fedora production quality or just > > beta test for Redhat?' > > You question implies there are only those two options available, which > might not be true. In this case your question would be inane. > > I would neither assume Fedora being RedHat's *beta* playing ground nor > would I use it for a server, which I *must* rely on. > I use it as my workstation OS and for my home server - I think that was > the goal of Fedora and it does it job fair enough. Actually, Fedora _is_ the beta stuff for RHEL. There is no RHEL beta stuff...it's either RHEL or it's Fedora. Example: RHEL5 is essentially Fedora Core 6. Of course, I look more at it as a "technology preview" rather than beta, but I'm weird. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - Rick Stevens, Principal Engineer rstevens@xxxxxxxxxxxx - - CDN Systems, Internap, Inc. http://www.internap.com - - - - Admitting you have a problem is the first step toward getting - - medicated for it. -- Jim Evarts (http://www.TopFive.com) - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
