Ed Greshko wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Who's definition? When a term can be ambiguous it is of little value
to me.
Use your favorite search engine and search for "Free software" and
"non-free". Read about it.
OK... By that I take it there is no one universally accepted definition of
those terms. Otherwise, there would be no need for all the different
flavors of the "free" licenses. GPLv2, GPLv3, FreeBSD, etc...
And, it would be easy to define it here.
Sure there is. You just got to read the definition that comes up. All
the licenses you quote above fit into the definition.
Rahul
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
