On 25/10/2007, Dave Burns <tburns@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Again, pure luck that when you did it, the mirror manager directed you > > to a repository that had the _complete set_ (!) of updates already and > > not just the new firefox [1]: > > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2007-October/msg00361.html > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2007-October/msg00362.html > > > > I am still not understanding either what the problem was or how to > work around it. Was it that people experiencing this problem updated > from repositories that had the new firefox but did not have updates > for all the things (e.g. epiphany) that might depend on gecko-libs? Exactly that was the problem. They only had the old gecko-libs in their old firefox, the old dependencies (yelp, devhelp, ...), and the new firefox in the updates repo told Yum/RPM that it would replace the old gecko-libs with a newer version. RPM noticed that this would breaks dependencies, and refused to install the updated firefox _without_ also installing updated dependency packages. > So > we should've tried to figure out what installed packages depend on > gecko-libs and look for updates for all of them? Substitute "look" with "wait". The firefox update (including the new gecko-libs version) was available, but the updated (= rebuilt) yelp, devhelp, liferea, ... packages were not available [yet]. Removing the old firefox forcefully and asking yum to reinstall it would not fix anything at all as long as the used repository carries only the new firefox/gecko-libs and still not the new dependencies. > Was there something > on those pages you mention above that should've implied this to me? Those are the update announcements, which show how the rebuilt dependencies showed up ~19 hours after the firefox update. Add to that the time it takes for the packages to be mirrored. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
