<snip> > > You should really cancel that report, and start again with a coherent > > bug report, and pick a more likely cause behind the problem. I'd guess > > udev would be a better item to first bugzilla it against. > > > > > I am sorry you don't like my bug report. But I have to say what you > complain about makes no sense either. Now I expect whom ever is assigned > that bug will have questions. Then I will answer them. > > > Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI I may be wrong but I would expect that either it gets sent to the bit bucket right away, or they send you a message requesting that you provide more information before they can even determine if it warrants them looking into it. I don't see them spending any time trying to decipher what you filed when there are no doubt numerous other bug reports pending or currently being worked on as well as coming in that contain sufficient details to allow them to deal with those properly. You may know exactly what you are talking about. You may have even articulated some of that in some postings on this list. But it is definitely not clear at all what you are talking about in that bug report and they most likely won't dig through the archives to see if you provided extra info on the list. Help the developers help you by taking Tim's suggestion to pull that report and take the time to articulate a detailed bug report. If it's not worth your time to do that then it's not worth their time to try and solve it. Jacques B. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
