Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 19 October 2007, Karl Larsen wrote:
I have put the new part of my overall grub writing on this list and
got complete quiet from the group. I ask you to read it again. The
definition of a root directory has been tested and it is right.
Frankly, I tried to read it, and never saw such a miss-understood writing, so
much so that I didn't feel it was worth a reply, and I doubt that anyone else
did either. I would not contaminate my thinking with that.
I gather from your in-ability to read the paper is because you think
it is complete crap? I would like to know what you think is wrong with it.
So onward and up. I want to write down exactly how you start one
grub with another. It is doable but the stuff in info grub is not
correct! I will prove that soon.
Prove it all you want, but please do it to yourself. The rest of us are
welcome to ignore you, and will. Until you have a basic understanding of
what grub is doing, please don't confuse the issue. Newbies to this list
have no way of filtering your spew of miss-information, making it doubly
harder for them to 'get it right'.
Your concern for the new people is touching. I do not see how what I
wrote can hurt the new people. I doubt they will understand it. Maybe
that is your problem?
--
Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
Linux User
#450462 http://counter.li.org.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
