Arthur Pemberton wrote:
Nothing warranting the kind of flaming that is going on. I've been using SELinux when appropriate for years now.
I think the real missing piece here is a good definition of 'appropriate' in this context (SELinux as delivered in fedora). What situation warrants the extra trouble of managing it, yet can deal with the general unstability and update frequency of the distribution?
-- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
