OT Re: mplayer without libmp3lame support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Edwad, I wont see your racist reply so dont bother replying...

But the last 2 lines sort of sums it up as to why...

~$ host -t txt 121.27.70.203.no-more-funn.moensted.dk
121.27.70.203.no-more-funn.moensted.dk descriptive text "seed.net.tw. Dynamic IP or generic rDNS. Use your ISPs mail service, or whitelist at: http://moensted.dk/spam/no-more-funn/?addr=203.70.27.121 based on reverse dns samples 1016924400"121.27.70.203.no-more-funn.moensted.dk descriptive text "TW does not seem to care about spam see http://moensted.dk/spam/no-more-funn/?addr=203.70.27.121 1175071330 #"


93% of the spam that manages to get past RBL's for the past several years
has been all from TW and CN, both are blocked for ever because of it.

TW/CN in an avg of one day send more spam into this country (based on the several domains I control, which are less blocking restrictive as they are paying customer accounts, only governed by 5 RBLs that mostly block TW/CN anyway <G>) than RR/Shaw/swbell all put together.

I also know that many of your ex-countrymen in the U.S also do same, call
us what you want, I (I'm sure like them) dont give a fuck, if it stops the spam that emits from your country into our networks, totally all for it, and there will be no hesitation of blocking other countries that get out of control either, if your country ever introduces serious anti-spam laws essentially making your ISP's get off their asses and clean things up, I'm sure the blocking policy will be gladly revisted and lifted, the same about CN.

I'm sure youll 'chest beat' with a response but again it wont bother me as
any reply to me is futile with the several filters to catch anything from you (amongst others) or contains a post of yours (inline quoted etc) into /dev/null, but I always keep my word, I told you i'd look into it and I have.

be gone...

On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Ed Greshko wrote:

Res wrote:

Thats your choice to call it that, but for you to call it that without
proof or knowing why that netblock is taken out, you yourself are no
better then what you accuse it of being.

Then tell me why 203.70.27.120/29 is blocked.  Also, why is
211.23.32.122~211.23.32.126 blocked.  I have other since I contract for more
companies in Taiwan and all of them are blocked from this site.




--
Cheers
Res


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux