Res wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Aly Dharshi wrote:
ummmm when your responsible for what I am, yeah, because I'm paid to
not have things fuck up, but since we
, you say it is your responsability, who else was involved with the
moving all servers to Slackware, we've never had a single hiccup, so
I aint had to any problems in years.
for fucks sake, RH cant even sort out their own rsync servers, why
would I try trusting them again, its a complete joke, and the funny
thing is, the same person resposible for it is probably still in
that job
Which is why you would run something like RHEL for production
No.... Its exactly why I dont run it. I've used RHEL, RHES and more
recently the RHEL clone CentOS, they are all still bloated to buggery,
unnecessary crud = unnecessary risks, Once a Slackware server is
installed it rarely needs to be touched, only if we want to put a new
kernel in, or the once in a blue moon security update, which is rare
because of the non-bloatness and non-butchering, slackware is
essentially a install and forget, it gives us more time to do new
projects.
--
Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
Linux User
#450462 http://counter.li.org.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
