On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 13:45 -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> Anyone on here familiar with setting up dhcpd to communicate with
> bind? Can I pick your brain for a bit? I have, what I believe to be a
> working configuration. Clients get IPs from the dhcp server and all.
> The mystery is that only some of them will trigger an update to bind,
> whereas others don't. More specifically, all the PeeCees (running
> WinXP) will trigger a ddns update, whereas none of the Macs (running
> various flavors of OS X) will do that.
>
> Anyone have any ideas? PeeCees will, Macs won't. What gives? As a
> comparison, here's a PeeCee lease data:
>
> lease 192.168.1.100 {
> starts 1 2007/10/08 19:09:59;
> ends 1 2007/10/08 23:09:59;
> tstp 1 2007/10/08 23:09:59;
> binding state active;
> next binding state free;
> hardware ethernet 00:16:17:17:22:8e;
> uid "\001\000\026\027\027\"\216";
> set ddns-rev-name = "100.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa.";
> set ddns-txt = "314aab3fdf5ed7eb054a0cc63549b31a52";
> set ddns-fwd-name = "Freehill.pcraft.com";
> client-hostname "Freehill";
> }
>
> And here's one from a Mac client:
>
> lease 192.168.1.230 {
> starts 1 2007/10/08 19:12:20;
> ends 1 2007/10/08 19:14:20;
> tstp 1 2007/10/08 19:14:20;
> binding state active;
> next binding state free;
> hardware ethernet 00:05:02:49:af:93;
> uid "\001\000\005\002I\257\223";
> }
>
----
put a legal entry on each Macintosh under System Preferences => Network
=> Built-In Ethernet => TCP/IP => client_id
--
Craig White <craig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
