Apparently Mike said: >>> selinux offeres no, i repeat NO advantage over what our normal >>> security is now. Alan Cox: >> Nobody competent to assess that I know of would agree with that statement. Mike McCarty: > That sounds more like a description of you than of anyone else. > > To my ears, it sounds like > > "Nobody who disagrees with me can have an opinion worth listening > to." Pot, kettle, black... You've approached this whole issue single-mindedly, and the aspect you carry on about regarding SELinux isn't only the aspect that it's for. -- [tim@bigblack ~]$ uname -ipr 2.6.22.5-76.fc7 i686 i386 Using FC 4, 5, 6 & 7, plus CentOS 5. Today, it's FC7. Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
