On Friday 21 September 2007, Andy Green wrote: >Somebody in the thread at some point said: >>> # touch /.autorelabel >>> >>> and a reboot. This will make sure your files have the right selinux >>> label, the cause of many problems. >> >> With all due respect Andy, I probably did that 6 or 7 times. Not once did >> it actually fix a problem. > >Well that will only fix "a problem" whose cause is a simple mislabelling >or lack of the selinux label. That has happened to me in the past >upgrading machines with old Fedora versions or ones with filesystems >that had previously been used with selinux=0. You can also make the >kind of problem this will fix by copying files, say from /var/www/html >to /home and then mv-ing them back. If your problem is different or >more subtle then naturally it won't help. > >Maybe I have been lucky, but I have been able to figure out how to get >around whatever selinux has complained about to me recently. Only once >did it need a local policy, to get gitweb working. > >So because that has been my experience, which I can see has been >different to yours I accept, I am more positive about trying to get it >working. > >-Andy Just for grins, Andy, I fired up my lappy which has been running with selinix=0 since the F7 install, did the touch /.autorelabel, then let it update to the latest with smart. That will install a newer kernel which I haven't built an ndiswrapper for just yet, but will reboot and do that. It will be interesting to see if I still have a network connection through my bcm4318 radio when its all done. I'll remove the grub option and set it to permissive before I do the final reboot. Ok, an hour later its all done, rebooted to permissive, relabeled (took about half an hour right there) ndiswrapper-1.48 installed. And by golly its still working, kdenetwork manager says the connection speed sucks, but I had to go get the newest flash for seamonkey and that came in only about 10k slower than my dsl connection. The log is showing me a bunch of what I think are bcm4318 related messages that look like stack traces, but it is running despite that. The messages are from: b43-phy0 ERROR: LO control pair validation failed (I: 111, Q: 111, used 1, calib: 0, initing: 0) And seemingly generated when b43 attempts to set the local oscillator. Or is that b43's way of bitching about the radio channel? DamnifIknow. Anybody got a clue to lend me? Latest F7 kernel but I saw it on the previous one before I rebooted to the new one too. I left this message sitting on screen, and went to do some shopping for eats, then went to the shop to cut the last two mortises in a side rail for a cabinet, and when I came back in just now, the last such messages showing in the messages tail were slightly different, but still generated a stack trace, naming rfatt=6, bbatt=5, and was at 15:42 pm, its now 20:01. Self repairing? So, ATM I have not run into an selinux problem while running in permissive but live mode. Progress at making it more 'user friendly'? Perhaps. I'll leave it setup as now & see how I fare trying to do my usual stuffs. Maybe it will actually be usable when I install F8 on this box. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 10.0 times 0.1 is hardly ever 1.0. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
