Bruce Byfield wrote:
I haven't been following this threat closely, so excuse me if I repeat
I suppose you meant "thread" and not "threat" :-)
what someone else has already said.
However, why don't those who prefer not to have SELinux use Revisor to
make their own custom install disk that excludes it?
See: http://revisor.fedoraunity.org/
This is intriguing if it would work. I doubt that is possible,
however. SELinux is not "a thing". It is a way of writing apps,
and is partially implemented in the kernel, I believe. It's not
possible simply not to install it. It's built into the kernel
and the apps. One could not install the management tools, but
not SELinux itself, in its current implementation.
Whether a loadable module and different load libraries which
implemented empty stubs would be possible is for others with
more expertise to answer.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
