Craig White wrote:
this is one of the reasons it won't ever happen... http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/06/15/red-hat-linux-gets-top-government-security-rating_1.html feel free to keep posting your uninformed opinions though and I note that this is clearly one circle where your opinions don't count.
Uninformed? Who is more informed about what I like and dislike than me? I don't know what you mean by "circle", but if you mean that RH isn't listening, then I agree. Also, if by "uninformed" you mean "in regards to security software in general", then you are mistaken. I have designed some security software for telephony equipment. BTW, it isn't surprising that the government would approve of someone who follows its recommendations. Security is not my top priority for my machine. BTW, would you follow ALL the govt recommendations for securing a machine? I trow not. Mike -- p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN. This message made from 100% recycled bits. You have found the bank of Larn. I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you. I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that! -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list