On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 16:53 +0000, Beartooth wrote: > Btw, I don't know if it's worth a whole nuther thread, but I've > been finding it advised or necessary to reboot a *lot* more in the > last year of three than before. In some cases it's just a simple answer to a lot of people (both advice some give, or an action some always take). It isn't always necessary. Though some don't realise that, having had it ingrained in them through using Windows. Or they like to check that their systems will still boot after their latest changes (if you reboot some weeks later, you mightn't remember what you changed that could be a problem). Having said that, things that alter really core behaviour may need a reboot to take effect. But, as far as I was aware, you could just issue the command to disable SELinux, and it's disabled. You'd also write in the disabling configuration changes, so that the next boot came up that way, too. -- [tim@bigblack ~]$ uname -ipr 2.6.22.4-65.fc7 i686 i386 Using FC 4, 5, 6 & 7, plus CentOS 5. Today, it's FC7. Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list