Andy Green wrote: > Somebody in the thread at some point said: > >> So, is bluetooth supposed to be much slower than USB connection? > > Yeah, it tops out at 2.1Mbps vs USB 480Mbps. In other words, BlueTooth is like USB, but slower, or like WiFi, but slower and shorter range. I still can't figure out why it's popular. Matt Flaschen -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
