Arthur Pemberton wrote: > On 9/10/07, Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I have clients using RHELv4 along with firefox 2.x and OpenOffice 2.2. Just >> because RHELv4 doesn't come with those application versions doesn't mean one >> can't create/maintain a local repository and update efficiently. We are >> talking about "large enterprises" with a dedicated IT staff, right? > > > That single policy/practice alone can generally elevate Fedora to > enterprise level stability. > > Vanilla fedora probably shouldn't be used in a production environment, > but put in your own managed and tested repo, and it should be just > fine. The operative word here is "should". Also, FWIW, "large enterprises" generally prefer to have maintenance contracts with the vendor. Since there is no "vendor" or "maintenance contract" available for Fedora...... -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
