Somebody in the thread at some point said: > On Sun, 9 Sep 2007, Frank Cox wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 03:47:33 -0400 (EDT) >> "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> if someone wants to simply RTFS, it's a bit disconcerting to learn >>> that you need to download another five source rpms to do it. >> I don't know if this is useful in your situation, but I'm pretty >> sure File Roller can "look inside" of srpm files and extract the >> contents for you as desired. > > that might come in handy, but it still doesn't solve the fundamental > problem of why a source rpm's "BuildRequires" value should affect the > simple tarball extraction and patch application operation. > > just for fun, i edited mkinitrd's spec file and deleted all the > "BuildRequires" lines, and the build prep worked just fine, so i'm > convinced that a simple prep should be possible without taking the > BuildRequires dependencies into account. now i just want an option > that implements that. > > well ... what are you just sitting there for? get to work. :-) Not sure I got the point across that the %prep section in the spec can contain arbitrary commands, not just %setup and %patch. Those arbitrary commands might be executing things that are provided by the BuildRequires. You can then say, well, it should look at %prep and decide whether to pull the BuildRequires in or not, but that sounds like a bad idea in terms of complexity for a crummy "feature". You're presumably planning to rebuild the thing at some point anyway. BTW there is yum localinstall that takes care of requires, maybe it or a relative can also do the same on SRPM BuildRequires? Never tried it. -Andy -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
