Andy Green wrote: > > New to me... but I do know that having an (external) initrd at all is > completely optional. You can (and I think Debian does it this way; I > certainly do it that way on embedded devices) get the kernel to mount > the filesystem on the /root= partition directly and jump straight into > the init program found on there. Maybe that is in fact done via this > mysterious internal cyst of an initrd, I don't know. > This depends on the drivers built into the kernel, and what driver your root file system needs. If the driver needed to read the root file system is build into the kernel, you do not need the initrd. IN simpler times, the standard IDE driver was built into the stock kernels, as well as the ext2 file system driver, so you only needed an initrd if you had an unusual IDE controller, if you were using something like SCSI drives, and/or you were using a different file system on the root device. (Because ext3 is ext2 with journaling added, the ext2 driver is enough for booting.) But that has changed. I have not looked lately, but I think the stock kernel only has drivers for the initrd, and any hard drive controller drivers need to be in it. I am not sure about file system drivers, but i suspect that ext2 is still compiled into the kernel. If I build my own kernel, I build in the drivers I know I am going to need. So an initrd is not needed. But I need to build a different kernel for my laptop, for my desktop, and for my server. (SATA, PATA, and SCSI controllers.) I don't want to get in to processor types, or some of the oddball machines around here. Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
