On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, Andy Green wrote: > Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > > i'm assuming that any command in the initramfs nash "init" script has > > to come from one of two places, no? > ... > > listed in the man page, and it's not a separate executable. so what's > > the story with "hotplug"? and "mkblkdevs" for that matter? if > > they're nash built-ins, they're certainly not mentioned in the man > > page. > > > > or am i missing something? > > No, you're quite right... nash manpage says > > Mon Aug 02 2004 > > at the bottom, although in the sources it hies from 2006. It seems > you will have to "use the source, luke" if you want to understand > these exotic nash builtins. i just submitted a low-priority bugzilla to fix the man page. i think that's sufficiently lazy, don't you? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca ======================================================================== -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list