On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 11:28:28 +0100 Chris Jones <jonesc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Another poster mentioned that pentiums > > have hardware instructions for trig functions. > > If you are using them, there isn't much hope for speed up. > > Out of interest, whats needs to be done to use these, some gcc flag ? My > profiling suggests that atan2(x,y) is taking ~ 50% of some method speed. Yes, > the methods is already fast, but still is this reasonable if hardware > instructions are being used. Is there some way I can check to see exactly > what is used ? You can use the binutils tools to disassemble the code if you want, or gdb to trace the instructions and step them (stepi) one at a time. The Intel hardware FP is pretty fast especially on the later processors and there's probably not a lot you can do to beat it. The AMD processors have some limited low precision trig functions in the 3DNow extensions designed for fast 3D gaming (before the cards started doing all the work ;)) Failing that small lookup tables are about the only option although if your precision is high the cache miss cost rapidly exceeds the gain from avoiding the FP math. Alan -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
