Re: Mantis package bombs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2007-08-26 at 13:40 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Charles Curley wrote:
> >> You aren't expecting every maintainer to subscribe to user lists
> >> and follow all the threads here. Do you? Very very few people have
> >> the time to do this and mailing lists are not a good place to keep
> >> track of bugs which is why bugzilla exists.
> > 
> > Yes, as a matter of fact, I do expect them to subscribe to this
> > list. Not because they are maintainers per se, but because
> > presumably they are users as well. It would be a bit difficult to
> > maintain a package without using Fedora. Of course I could be wrong,
> > which would explain the state of the Mantis package.
> 
> But not all users will gain from reading the messages on this list.
> Certainly most folks capable of maintaining packages would get bored
> reading the many questions by folks that are new users, especially if
> they don't have time to help out with answering those questions.
> 
> You may well know what the package to maintainer ratio is in Fedora.
> If not, it's rather large, with nearly 4700 source packages in the
> distro and a little other 400 maintainers.  I don't think it's all
> that unreasonable to ask that users help out by reporting bugs to
> bugzilla.
> 
> I do understand your hesitation of the package seems so full of bugs
> that it's pointless.  However, if that doesn't get bugzilla'd, then
> other maintainers may not find out for a while that something is
> horribly awry in the mantis package and that someone needs some help
> (or a smack with the cluestick).  So, a bugzilla may be the most
> helpful thing you could do for a terribly broken package, even if it
> just says that there are numerous problems (listing them briefly) with
> the package and the whole things needs work.
I agree that bugzilla should work but it has never worked for me. I file
bugzillas and nothing much happens. By the time we get through all the
requests for further info a new distribution is out and it makes no
difference.

I will admit some bugzilla reports are resolved but I have never been
that lucky.

I will go further and explain in what situation it is useless to
bugzilla. When you problem is more or less unique to your system. If a
large fraction on users are having the same problem that your chances of
getting an answer are better.
--
=======================================================================
The world needs more people like us and fewer like them.
=======================================================================
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux