Re: Virus

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> We just disagree. Opening up the web site gives the sender the
> information that it has found a live user who can be conned in some way.
> This conning has nothing to do with using Windows.
> Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

If done as Ian stated, yes they could determine that a particular
e-mail address responded by clicking on the link.  I have not observed
that.  If they are cleverly obfuscating my email address in the URL
then perhaps they may have sneaked one past me.

As for having nothing to do with Windows, you are correct as far as
the social engineering aspect of it is concerned.  But you said by
visiting the site you were compromised.  That would only occur if the
site had code in it to exploit your browser - hence why I mentioned
Windows and IE as being at risk of being compromised by "simply
visiting" whereas Linux with Firefox is not.  The part about getting
you to enter personal information is the social engineering aspect
which agreed has nothing to do with the OS and everything to do with
what's in between the ears.

I'm certainly not advocating that people start following these links.
To the contrary I agree they should not.  I was simply disagreeing
with your statement that the OP was automatically compromised for
having just visited the site.  Re-read my last posting and you will
see that that was the point I was making.  We agree on most, just not
on the part that you are automatically compromised for having followed
such a link.  Some personal information (email address if done as Ian
explained) and non-identifying information (IP, browser, OS) is
potentially harvested by the server.  Maybe it's just a difference in
how we interpret "compromised".  I do not call that being compromised
as to me that would involve either your system becoming infected or
you sharing personal/identifying information that could allow a person
to steal your identity or otherwise leverage that personal information
for financial gain.

Anyhow, enough OT for me.  Feel free to post a rebuttal.  If you wish
to debate beyond a rebuttal then let's take it off-line or on a list
dedicated to such debates.


Jacques B.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux