On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 12:15 -0400, awrobinson-ml@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > ---- "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Andrew Robinson wrote: > > > > > I recently upgraded to the latest kernel on FC6, 2.6.22.1-32.fc6, and when I > > > did, my wireless failed to initialize. I posted a query here, and it was > > > suggested I needed to upgrade to version 4 of the bcm43xx driver. I found this > > > procedure to do so: > > > > > > # you need to be root > > > wget http://downloads.openwrt.org/sources/broadcom-wl-4.80.53.0.tar.bz2 > > > tar -xjvf broadcom-wl-4.80.53.0.tar.bz2 > > > bcm43xx-fwcutter -w /lib/firmware/ broadcom-wl-4.80.53.0/kmod/wl_apsta.o > > > > > > When I run the bcm43xx-fwcutter command, I get this error: > > > > > > Sorry, the input file is either wrong or not supported by bcm43xx-fwcutter. > > > This file has an unknown MD5sum 9207bc565c2fc9fa1591f6c7911d3fc0. > > > > > > Anyone know what I'm doing wrong? > > > > i've done the above a number of times, without fail. are you sure the > > tarball file itself is uncorrupted? > > > My experience with tar files says that if the file uncompresses and "un-archives", the tar file is not corrupted. Not a 100% guarantee of course. If files within the tar archive were corrupt, seems like more people would be complaining. So I can't rule this out, but it seems unlikely. > > Andrew > Hi, Andrew, Tarballs do get corrupted. I have had it happen. It is rare, but not entirely discountable. The problems with archives and tarballs being corrupted is well known, and that is why sha1sums and other check sum methods are used to verify the files contents after transmission. And for what it is worth, I have had them untar successfully when they were corrupted. Regards, Les H -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
