On 19/08/07, Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > > ./libmylib.so.1 ln -s /usr/lib/libmylib.so.1 libmylib.so The > > requirement is /usr/lib directory will have : libmylib.so.x > > libmylib.so -> libmylib.so.x > > Throw out your ln command altogether. Just place the .so in /usr/lib > and run /sbin/ldconfig in %post. It will make the symlinks according to > the library soname. That is false advise, however, since you want to create all necessary symlinks in the %install section in order to include them in the %files section and the package. If you don't include the symlinks in the package, but let ldconfig create them, the files don't belong to any package, which is a packaging bug. The original poster should give a few more details, such as verbose output of listing the buildroot and rpmbuild output. We have thousands of packages in Fedora 6 where rpmbuild does not segfault when packaging library symlinks, so this sounds very unusual. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
