Re: smbfs support broken in FC7?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/17/07, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> > On 8/16/07, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Note: this question is not "what do I use instead of smbfs" it's "how do
> >> I get smbfs working?" FAQs read, searches done, not interested in CIFS
> >> since the server doesn't speak it. I need to get data off a machine
> >> which speaks only SMB, so I'm looking for ways to do that. I have two
> >> servers which write logs I need, and I'm tired of using an old FC1 box
> >> to do it. Surely core functionality like SMB hasn';t really been
> >> removed, has it?
> >>
> >> Using CIFS, linking mount.cifs to mount.smbfs, downloading several
> >> smbmount "replacements" which don't work, and other obvious things found
> >> in a few hours of search and swear testing. The error was
> >>   error 112 = host is down
> >> which I guess means "host wants to talk SMB not CIFS" in reality.
> >>
> >> Other info:
> >> .  smbtree can see the filesystems required, discard all the hardware,
> >> network, etc, guesses
> >> . the new machines with FC7 send packets to the right host, but they
> >> aren't using SMB
> >>   as confirmed by tcpdump, discard DNS guesses
> >> . the host is up for ping and ftp, and various other distributions from
> >> FC1 to FC4 are able to mount
> >>   the f/s (those were the machines not in production) discard host and
> >> server problem guesses
>
> >
> > If the machine speaks SMB, then CIFS will work, most likely, you're
> > trying to mount using the netbios names.
> >
> Just what other names do you expect the old server to know? As noted in
> the O.P. smbtree can see the machine and the shares, and they have the
> names I'm using. I don't know where any other names would appear.


Look. Cut the popus attitude. You have little idea what you're doing
and have fixated on the wrong problem. The solution is fairly simple,
and if you would approach this rationally you'd come at the answer.

I was willing to tell you, but you seem more interested in blaming
something, when there isn't even a bug per say.


-- 
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux